Primary care access is often judged by appointment supply, waiting times, and utilisation, yet patients experience access as a series of small obstacles that accumulate into delay, drop-off, and avoidable deterioration. Building on existing literature on administrative burden, treatment burden, digital exclusion, and telemedicine inequity, this commentary proposes the Access Friction Index (AFI) as a practical framework for measuring the real-world effort required to convert a health need into timely assessment, follow-up, and treatment. Drawing on recent evidence from the UK, US and other settings, it links access friction to inequities for vulnerable groups, missed screening, medication non-adherence, unplanned return visits, and avoidable hospital use. It also outlines how routine service data and electronic records could be used to identify friction hotspots—including repeated contact, mode switching, handoffs, results handling failures, and delayed pathway closure—and how primary ...
The 10-Year Health Plan for England aspires to create ‘the most digitally accessible health system in the world by 2028’ with the NHS App positioned as the primary gateway to the NHS. This is an ambitious and it is encouraging to see health inequalities given prominence in the plan’s executive summary. However, extensive evidence, including evaluations of the NHS App specifically, shows significant disparities in who is able and likely to use digital health technologies. Without addressing these broader social and structural determinants of digital access and use, an overreliance on the NHS App risks deepening existing health inequalities and failing to improve population health for all. Although the NHS App has been been broadly adopted, it risks widening health disparities unless the health service or community groups can support patients to access and use the App appropriately. There must be clear value from using the NHS App and its features for patients, alongside equitable opport...