In a letter published in The Lancet, in response to their recent series on universal health coverage, John Lee and colleagues from the Department of Primary Care & Public Health at Imperial College London comment that many people still need to pay a high proportion of total health expenditure out of pocket. Patients’ costs must be reduced to further improve health and provide financial protection in health systems with universal health coverage Governments should continue to lower user charges in health systems with universal health coverage Rather than seeing lower financial contributions from patients as an efficiency loss, they should see it as a means to promote prevention and the use of cost-effective services.
As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments fo...
Comments