Skip to main content

Arguments in Favour of a Salaried GP Service

The independent contractor model has been at the core of general practice in the UK since the NHS was first established and this model has many strengths. For example it has allowed the development of a s strong primary care sector that has allowed the NHS to operate efficiently - NHS general practices have typically used between 8-10% of the total NHS budget and dealt with up to 90% of all patient contacts with the NHS. However, in recent years, general practices have come under increasing pressure through a combination of rising workload, increased complexity of care, and a reduction in the resources allocated to primary care.

Many general practitioners now find themselves struggling to cope with their day to day workloads. This makes it difficult for patients to gain timely access to their general practices and in turn increases pressure on other parts of the NHS, such as Emergency Departments. We are also now seeing a divide developing in the profession between salaried GPs and GP Principals. Would a move to a salaried GP service in which GPs became NHS employees (and not employees of commercial companies) help address these problems? In this blog post, I list some of the potential advantages of a move to a salaried GP service. Please let me know if there are any additional advantages not listed here.

1. Under their current contract, the funding received by a general practice from the NHS is largely a fixed sum based on list size and, unlike the tariff-based payments made to hospitals, it does not increase if a practice’s workload increases. This funding mechanism was devised some time ago and does not take into account recent changes in areas such as primary care consultation rates, patient complexity or the new demands placed on general practitioners for non-clinical and managerial activities.

2. General practitioners currently face unrestricted demands for their services and on their time while having to operate on a fixed budget. Under a salaried model, the primary care service could be funded in a similar way to the tariff-based payments made to hospitals so that extra work was accompanied by additional funding.

3. There is great variation in how individual practice operate and in their staffing levels. A salaried service in which GPs became NHS employees would allow for greater standardisation of operating procedures and staffing levels.

4. As salaried NHS employees, general practitioners would need to be employed on similar terms to consultants if recruitment of high-calibre medical graduates into general practice was to be maintained. Salary levels would also be less variable than they are now.

5. General practitioners would have job plans that would need to give them sufficient time for non-clinical duties and for learning and development, as well as for their clinical duties. They would also be would be protected by the European Working Time Directive from working excessive hours, and be could relinquish some of the tasks they currently undertake. As with consultants, there could be career progression and pay increments based on experience and for taking on additional duties in areas such as management, teaching, training and quality improvement.

6. General practitioners could have the opportunity to work in integrated care organisations that would also employ community staff and specialists. This would encourage the integration of care, shared IT systems and reduce duplication between different sectors of the NHS and between different professional groups.
Integration of out of hours and emergency care could also be improved, with general practitioners working as the first point of contact for most emergency cases and emergency departments reserved for more serious cases.

7. Workforce planning could be improved with general practitioners deployed in sufficient numbers to meet the needs of local populations. Skill-mix could also be examined with transfer of many routine tasks to groups such as nurses, physician assistants and health care assistants.

8. If general practitioners do not start to negotiate now on our employment terms, the alternative is likely to be a proliferation of APMS contracts and employment of GPs by commercial companies on significantly worse terms than those offered to its medical employees by the NHS.

You can also read the opposing argument. See also my JRSM editorial: General practice in the United Kingdom: meeting the challenges of the early 21st century


Popular posts from this blog

Improving discharge planning in NHS hospitals

Factors that need to be considered in discharge planning that have been identified in previous projects include:

Ensuring that discharge arrangements are discussed with patients, family members and carers; and that they are given a copy of the discharge summary.Adequate coordination between the hospital, community health services, general practices, and the providers of social care services.There is a follow-up after discharge of patients at high risk of complications or readmission - either in person or by telephone - to ensure that the discharge arrangements are working well. Medicines reconciliation is carried out. This is the process of verifying patient medication lists at a point-of-care transition, such as hospital discharge, to identify which medications have been added, discontinued, or changed from pre-admission medication lists.Ensuring that any outstanding test results at discharge are obtained and passed on to primary care teams; and ensuring there are clear arrangements …

Can GPs issue private prescriptions to NHS patients?

The NHS prescription charge in England is currently £8.40 per item. At this level, many commonly prescribed drugs will cost less than the prescription charge and so some NHS patients may occasionally ask if they can have a private prescription rather than an NHS prescription.

In the past, some GPs have been advised that they could issue both an NHS FP10 and a private prescription, and let the patient decide which to use. But the British Medical Association's General Practice Committee has obtained legal advice that said under the current primary care contract, GPs in England may not issue a private prescription alongside or as an alternative to an NHS FP10 prescription. In any consultation where a GP needs to issue an FP10, the concurrent issue of a private prescription would be a breach of NHS regulations.

The issuing of a private prescription in such circumstances could also be seen as an attempt to deprive the NHS of the funds it would receive from the prescription charge. Fur…

What impact will Brexit have on the UK's life sciences sector?

On Thursday 3 November 2016, I spoke at a seminar at the Imperial College Business School on the topic of the impact of Brexit on the UK's life sciences sector (the NHS, universities, and pharmaceutical and biomedical companies). I emphasised the important role played in the life sciences sector by EU-trained professionals and the need to ensure that the UK continued to attract highly-qualified professionals to work, for example, in our National Health Service. I also discussed the need to increase spending on research and development to ensure that the UK remained a world leader in the biomedical industry. The other speakers at the seminar were Andrew Lansley (former Secretary of State for Health) and Richard Phillips (Director of Healthcare Policy at the Association of British Healthcare industries). The event was chaired by Andrew Brown. A copy of my talk can be viewed on Slideshare.