Skip to main content

Over two million people in England may be eligible for surgery to treat obesity

Over two million people in England may be eligible for surgery to treat obesity, according to new research published in JRSM Open. However, fewer than 7000 patients underwent these procedures in 2011.

Carrying out more bariatric surgery procedures would help to reduce obesity-related ill health, the study authors from Imperial College London said, but the NHS may need to invest in more resources to meet demand.

Bariatric surgery – a set of surgical procedures performed on obese people to decrease their stomach size – can greatly reduce the likelihood of death from obesity-related diseases such as type 2 diabetes, stroke or coronary heart disease.

Despite clear guidelines outlining who can undergo such surgery with the NHS, and evidence that these procedures are cost-effective in the long run, less than one per cent of those eligible have weight loss surgery each year. The researchers say this raises questions about why more procedures are not currently being carried out.

One possible reason is lack of awareness of the surgical procedures and potential benefits. Commitment to lifestyle intervention is also an important barrier, as patients must be willing to enter a full life-changing programme involving intensive management in a specialist obesity service and commitment to long-term follow-up.

Those eligible are more likely to be women, be retired, have no formal education and be from a lower socio-economic status than the general population.

Dr Sonia Saxena, from the Department of Primary Care and Public Health at Imperial College London, said: “Performing more operations could be very good for the population in terms of improving patient health. You could cut down on a number of very severe conditions and extend life expectancy in patients who are likely to suffer significant problems as a result of their obesity.”

But the research, funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England and the National Institute for Health Research, revealed that the capacity of health services to meet this demand is limited.

The NHS would be overwhelmed because there isn’t the resource to actually carry out this number of operations,” Dr Saxena added.

If everyone who was eligible came forward there would most likely be a restriction because of funding and resource allocation at the local level.”

To calculate the number of eligible people, twe used population data from the 2006 Health Survey for England, a nationally representative household survey carried out every year by the government to plan health services and make policy decisions.

We combined them with guidelines from the 2006 UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The NICE guidelines assess eligibility for bariatric surgery according to a person’s body mass index (BMI), a measure of body shape based on mass and height. People with a BMI exceeding 40, or those with a BMI between 35 and 40 and suffering from one or more obesity-related diseases, are eligible for bariatric surgery with the NHS.

But Dr Saxena explained that eligibility based on NICE guidelines alone is not the end of the story. “We know from our previous work in the United States that fewer bariatric surgery operations are carried out in disadvantaged groups who are most in need of the operation because of a lack of health coverage. But everyone who is eligible is entitled to the operation in the NHS and there is a huge potential health gain. Some of those who are eligible may not be aware they could benefit or willing to make the lifestyle changes for a successful procedure.”

Reference: A. Ahmad et al. 'Eligibility for bariatric surgery among adults in England: analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.' JRSM Open January 2014 vol. 5 no. 1

Media Coverage
Daily Mirror
Daily Express
Daily Mail


Popular posts from this blog

Improving how secondary care and general practice in England work together: the NHS Standard Contract

Due to the increasing pressures on general practices within the National Health Service in England, the interface between primary and secondary care, and the division of labour between these, has become an important issue. This has long been an area prone to difficulties and conflict, the consequences of which can directly impact the quality and safety of patient care, particularly for patients with chronic conditions who regularly transition between these two sectors. In an article published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Amy Price and I explore the measures recently implemented in the NHS Standard Contract which aim to target common issues at the primary–secondary care interface, with an aim to reducing inappropriate general practitioner workload in England. We discuss the context behind the implementation of the NHS Standard Contract as well as current concerns and areas for further consideration.

The current crisis in primary care means the NHS Standard Contract…

Dr Demis Hassabis, Co-Founder and CEO of DeepMind, Speaks about AI in Healthcare

On 28 September 2017, I attended the Annual Institute of Global Health Innovation Lecture: Artificial General Intelligence and Healthcare, delivered by Dr Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind. Artificial intelligence is the science of making machines smart argued Dr Hassabis, so how can we make it improve the healthcare sector? Dr Hassabis then went on to describe the work that DeepMind was carrying out in healthcare in areas such as organising information, deep learning to support the reporting of medical images (such as scans and pathology slides), and biomedical science. Dr Hassabis also discussed the challenges of applying techniques such as reinforcement learning in healthcare. He concluded that artificial intelligence has great scope for improving healthcare; for example, by prioritising the tasks that clinicians had to carry out and by providing decision support aids for both patients and doctors. Dr Hassabis also discussed some of the ethical issues in using …

Patients are more satisfied with general practices managed by GP partners than those managed by companies

General practices in England are independent businesses that are contracted to provide primary care for specified populations. Most are owned by general practitioners, but many types of organisation are now eligible to deliver these services. In a study published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, we examined the association between patient experience and the contract type of general practices in England, distinguishing limited companies from other practices.

We analysed data from the English General Practice Patient Survey 2013–2014 (July to September 2013 and January to March 2014). Patients were eligible for inclusion in the survey if they had a valid National Health Service number, had been registered with a general practice for six months or more, and were aged 18 years or over. All general practices in England with eligible patients were included in the survey (n = 8017).

Patients registered to general practices owned by limited companies reported worse experience…