Skip to main content

Over two million people in England may be eligible for surgery to treat obesity

Over two million people in England may be eligible for surgery to treat obesity, according to new research published in JRSM Open. However, fewer than 7000 patients underwent these procedures in 2011.

Carrying out more bariatric surgery procedures would help to reduce obesity-related ill health, the study authors from Imperial College London said, but the NHS may need to invest in more resources to meet demand.

Bariatric surgery – a set of surgical procedures performed on obese people to decrease their stomach size – can greatly reduce the likelihood of death from obesity-related diseases such as type 2 diabetes, stroke or coronary heart disease.

Despite clear guidelines outlining who can undergo such surgery with the NHS, and evidence that these procedures are cost-effective in the long run, less than one per cent of those eligible have weight loss surgery each year. The researchers say this raises questions about why more procedures are not currently being carried out.

One possible reason is lack of awareness of the surgical procedures and potential benefits. Commitment to lifestyle intervention is also an important barrier, as patients must be willing to enter a full life-changing programme involving intensive management in a specialist obesity service and commitment to long-term follow-up.

Those eligible are more likely to be women, be retired, have no formal education and be from a lower socio-economic status than the general population.

Dr Sonia Saxena, from the Department of Primary Care and Public Health at Imperial College London, said: “Performing more operations could be very good for the population in terms of improving patient health. You could cut down on a number of very severe conditions and extend life expectancy in patients who are likely to suffer significant problems as a result of their obesity.”

But the research, funded by the Higher Education Funding Council for England and the National Institute for Health Research, revealed that the capacity of health services to meet this demand is limited.

The NHS would be overwhelmed because there isn’t the resource to actually carry out this number of operations,” Dr Saxena added.

If everyone who was eligible came forward there would most likely be a restriction because of funding and resource allocation at the local level.”

To calculate the number of eligible people, twe used population data from the 2006 Health Survey for England, a nationally representative household survey carried out every year by the government to plan health services and make policy decisions.

We combined them with guidelines from the 2006 UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). The NICE guidelines assess eligibility for bariatric surgery according to a person’s body mass index (BMI), a measure of body shape based on mass and height. People with a BMI exceeding 40, or those with a BMI between 35 and 40 and suffering from one or more obesity-related diseases, are eligible for bariatric surgery with the NHS.

But Dr Saxena explained that eligibility based on NICE guidelines alone is not the end of the story. “We know from our previous work in the United States that fewer bariatric surgery operations are carried out in disadvantaged groups who are most in need of the operation because of a lack of health coverage. But everyone who is eligible is entitled to the operation in the NHS and there is a huge potential health gain. Some of those who are eligible may not be aware they could benefit or willing to make the lifestyle changes for a successful procedure.”

Reference: A. Ahmad et al. 'Eligibility for bariatric surgery among adults in England: analysis of a national cross-sectional survey.' JRSM Open January 2014 vol. 5 no. 1

Media Coverage
BBC
Pulse
ITV
Daily Mirror
Daily Express
Daily Mail
MSN

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Protecting Against the "Quad-demic": Influenza, Covid-19, Norovirus and RSV

As the NHS braces for a challenging winter season, it is grappling with a "quad-demic" of health emergencies caused by influenza, Covid-19, norovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This confluence of viral threats poses a significant risk to public health in the UK as well as putting strain on healthcare resources, emphasising the importance of preventive measures to safeguard public health. Public health measures such a vaccination and good personal hygiene are pivotal in reducing the impact of these illnesses, particularly for vulnerable groups. The Four Viruses: What Are They? Influenza: A highly contagious respiratory infection that causes significant illness each winter. It can lead to severe complications, particularly in the elderly, young children, pregnant women, and those with chronic health conditions. Covid-19: Though its most acute phase has passed, Covid-19 remains a concern, especially as new variants of SA...

The Hidden Cost of Cheaper NHS Contracts: Losing Community Trust

NHS budgets are under considerable pressure. It is therefore unsurprising that many NHS Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) In England will aim to prioritise price in contract awards, But this approach is a significant threat to community-centred healthcare. While competitive tendering is a legally required, an excessive focus on costs in awarding NHS contracts risks overshadowing key factors such as established community trust, local expertise, and the long-term impact on continuity of care. This shift towards cheaper, often external, commercial providers threatens to cut the links between communities and their local health services. The argument that competitive tendering is solely about legal compliance, and not cost, is undermined by the very nature of such tendering, which by design encourages the lowest bid. This approach risks eroding the social fabric of local healthcare provision, where established relationships and understanding of specific community needs are essential. Establishe...

MPH Student Presentations on the NHS Care.Data Programme

As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments fo...