Skip to main content

Response to the British Orthopaedic Association

In a recent statement, the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) criticised general practitioners (GPs) for their management of patients with knee problems and seemed to be blaming GPs for high rates of inappropriate arthroscopy in the UK. The statement was subsequently revised after criticism from GPs. The BOA seemed to be unaware that GPs refer patients to specialists for an opinion on further management. The decision to proceed to an intervention such as arthroscopy lies with the specialist - in consultation with the patient who has to agree to a procedure being carried out. The BOA also seemed unaware of how services for musculoskeletal problems are delivered in the NHS, both in primary care and in specialist settings, which is very worrying if true.

Where I practise in London, referrals for musculoskeletal problems are made to an Integrated Musculoskeletal Service in which the initial assessment is made by a physiotherapist. Most patients are generally then referred for physiotherapy and self-directed exercise. Only a minority of patients are referred on to a rheumatologist or orthopaedic surgeon. We do have direct access to MRI scans but this is not something we use often (in the last year, I have only referred one patient for an MRI scan of the knee). Because of the referral pathway we have locally, it has been some time since I have made a direct NHS referral to an orthopaedic consultant. Private referrals are a different matter and in my practice there is a steady stream of private referrals to orthopaedic surgeons (many of our patients have private health insurance). I note that I have never had a private referral to an orthopaedic surgeon returned to me on the grounds that the patient should have had a course of exercise or physiotherapy before referral.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

UK Covid-19 Inquiry - The Importance of a Strong Primary Healthcare System

In my witness statement for Module 10 of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, I discuss the pandemic's impact through from the perspectives of  primary care and public health, drawing on my extensive experience as a senior academic at Imperial College London and as a practising GP and NHS Public Health Specialist.  I emphasise that the pandemic disproportionately affected people who were clinically vulnerable, the disabled, ethnic minority communities and those living in deprived areas. The pandemic highlighted how structural inequalities, multigenerational housing, and employment in high-risk frontline roles exacerbated health disparities.  My statement also critiques the weakening of public health infrastructure - particularly for the control of infectious diseases - and the lack of integrated health data systems to identify at-risk groups such as the clinically vulnerable. I also advocated for a more robust preventive healthcare model that prioritises community-based primary care ...

Relevance Over Recall: Rethinking How AI Uses Clinical Data

Our article in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine argues that safe and effective AI in healthcare must incorporate mechanisms that emulate human judgement - down-weighting old, inaccurate or superseded information and prioritising what is recent, clinically relevant and reaffirmed - so that AI supports, rather than disrupts, high-quality patient care.  Clinicians constantly revise, reinterpret and filter past information so that only what is relevant, accurate and timely shapes present-day management decisions; medical records function as dynamic “working tools” rather than fixed archives. By contrast, many AI systems lack this capacity for selective forgetting and often treat all historical data as equally meaningful.  This can lead to outdated or low-confidence diagnoses being repeatedly resurfaced, persistent labels influencing clinical expectations, and irrelevant, long-resolved events cluttering summaries and decision-support outputs. Such indiscriminate recall...