Skip to main content

Now is the time for radical action on racial health inequalities

A new report by the NHS Race and Health Observatory makes robust recommendations—we must act on them

The magnitude of racial health inequalities reported in the NHS Race and Health Observatory’s recent review comes as no surprise.1 It highlighted the overwhelming, stark, widespread, and longstanding inequalities that people from ethnic minorities in the UK experience in access to healthcare and outcomes. The report found that this occurs “at every stage, throughout the life course, from birth to death” and is “rooted in experiences of structural, institutional, and interpersonal racism.”1 This evidence has been known for a long time, with the disproportionate impacts of covid-19 on people from ethnic minorities drawing even greater attention to and wider recognition of these facts.23 Will evidence, however, be enough to compel those charged with the nation’s health to acknowledge and take urgent action to redress these egregious inequalities?

Firstly, there are significant gaps in the literature, as well as poor quality, inconsistent, and incomplete data in some places. Secondly, the review only focused on five “priority” areas: mental health, maternal and neonatal care, digital healthcare, genomic medicine, and the NHS workforce. However, the evidence that exists, which spans over a decade and has been examined by this independent body, should be a wake-up call for the government and the NHS.

Fear and distrust run through most of this review, particularly in mental healthcare, maternal care, and digital access. Furthermore, negative experiences, poor communication, and substandard care marked by insensitive, discriminatory interactions are also common among ethnic minorities, who are then deterred from seeking care from the NHS. There are significant barriers to accessing psychological therapies, including cognitive behavioural therapies and children’s mental health services, due to fewer referrals from general practice, but also lower levels of health literacy, poorer access to online health services, and resultant challenges to self-referral. This illustrates the need for a broader approach to tackle health inequalities, including working on areas such as education and poverty.

People from ethnic minority groups, particularly Black individuals, are more likely to face compulsory admission to psychiatric wards, receive harsher treatments, and are more likely to be restrained and put into seclusion.14 NHS staff from ethnic minorities do not fare any better than the patients. Their experiences are marked by racist abuse—both from patients and other staff—lack of career progression, and an ethnic pay gap.15

The review suggests robust recommendations on how to bring about a radical and imaginative change in policy, practice, attitude, and approach. It starts with better, more accurate, and granular ethnic data monitoring in the NHS and linking these clinical data across the health service to improve clinical outcomes for ethnic minority groups. It is also necessary to improve access to and experiences of care by more targeted investment, as well as providing resources for some areas, such as high quality interpreter services.1

There is also much that needs to be done to build trust. The impact of the covid-19 pandemic, especially the lower uptake of covid-19 vaccines among certain groups, has brought the issue of trust into sharp relief.6 Trust cannot be built if the government continues to abnegate responsibility and turn its face away from the lived experiences of racism, in particular systemic racism, among ethnic minorities. A sincere attempt to understand and engage with communities will do much to establish trust, which will, in turn, lead to better health outcomes.

Neither evidence nor a clarion call for action alone—no matter how clarifying and stark—would lead to meaningful change. We have been here before. Numerous past inquiries, by governments and independent bodies alike, have made urgent calls for a new approach, only to be frustrated by inaction, endless deferrals, and delays.3

A strong political will is, therefore, required to turn the wheels of change. Inaction costs lives and would lead to a worsening of systematic socioeconomic and health inequalities. For those of us who have raised the ineluctable facts of racism—in particular systemic racism—as a major driver of racial health inequalities,7 our position is perhaps encapsulated by the author and public intellectual CW Lewis in his 1942 novel, The Screwtape Letters.

“The greatest evil is done not in sordid dens of evil that Dickens loved to paint, but it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clear, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices.” 8

The time to tackle unconscionable racial health inequalities in this country is now and the NHS Race and Health Observatory’s review can help start that change.

This article was first published in the British Medical Journal.

References

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Example ADHD Referral Letter

Dear Dr, I am writing to refer a 28-year-old male patient of mine, Mr [Patient's Name], for assessment for the diagnosis and treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). After a thorough clinical assessment, I believe that Mr. [Patient's Name] meets the criteria for adult ADHD as outlined in NHS guidance for primary care teams in SE London. Mr [Patient's Name] has been under my care for XX years and, during this time, he reports several symptoms (greater than five symptoms in total) consistent with ADHD in adults that have been present for more than six months. These symptoms include difficulties in focusing, following through on tasks, hyperactivity, forgetfulness, impulsiveness, restlessness, and irritability. Mr [Patient's Name] also reports being easily distracted, struggling with time management, organisation, and completing tasks efficiently. Many of Mr [Patient's Name]'s symptoms have been present since he was under 12 years old; and have

Dr Curran and Partners – Clinical Update 10 August 2023

1. Measles The UKHSA has warned that unless MMR vaccination rates improve, London could experience a large measles outbreak. Measles is potentially a very serious illness with important complications - but is preventable though vaccination.  Please ensure patients and their families are up to date with their vaccinations. Please also check the vaccine status of new patients - particular migrants - and enter details onto the medical record of any vaccines given elsewhere. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/london-at-risk-of-measles-outbreaks-with-modelling-estimating-tens-of-thousands-of-cases 2. Shingles vaccination The shingles vaccine programme is being expanded. From September, GP practices will offer: - Those aged 70-79, 1 dose of Zostavax or 2 doses of Shingrix - People aged 50+ with a weak immune system, 2 doses of Shingrix - Those turning 65 & 70, two doses of Shingrix vaccine. For further details, see https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/shingles-vacc

Why we need to put an end to the GANFYD culture in the UK

One of the causes of increased workload in general practice are the many requests that doctors get for letters, reports and forms from patients or from external organisations. It’s now so common that doctors have coined a term for it: GANFYD – Get A Note From Your Doctor.  It’s seems that large sections of society can’t function without these “letters from doctors”. Instead of using common sense or employing their own clinical advisers, external organisations make repeated requests to NHS doctors for letters which are often not at all needed. Often the worst offenders come from the public sector – e.g. universities who seem to look upon NHS general practice as a source of free occupational health advice for their students. Universities never – of course - offer to pay for this advice they get from NHS GPs. Instead, university requests will come with a mealy-mouthed statement that any fee is the responsibility of the student. Like doctors are going to impose heavy fees on impoverished s