Skip to main content

The importance of coding Long Covid in electronic medical records

As the world continues to grapple with the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, Long Covid has emerged as a significant public health challenge. Characterised by persistent symptoms like fatigue, brain fog, shortness of breath, and joint pain lasting weeks, months or even years after an infection, Long Covid affects millions globally. Yet, one major hurdle in understanding and addressing this condition is its under-recording in electronic medical records (EMRs).

Accurate coding of Long Covid in EMRs is essential for studying its epidemiology, improving patient care, and managing its impact on healthcare systems and on societies. Electronic medical records are at the core of modern health systems and have largely replaced the more traditional paper-based records used by healthcare providers for many decades. Electronic medical records are used to track patient diagnoses, treatments, and clinical outcomes. When Long Covid is not properly coded, it becomes difficult to use this data to carry out these tasks. Accurate coding using standardised systems such as SNOMED enables researchers and healthcare providers to:

  • Track Prevalence and Trends: Consistent coding allows us to estimate how many people are affected by Long Covid, identify demographic patterns, and monitor changes over time.
  • Study Risk Factors and Outcomes: Properly coded data helps researchers pinpoint who is most at risk and how Long Covid impacts long-term health.
  • Optimise Healthcare Resources: Understanding the true burden of Long Covid helps health systems allocate resources, plan specialised clinics, and train clinicians.
  • Support Policy and Funding: Reliable data informs public health policies and justifies funding for Long Covid research and treatment programs.

Without accurate coding, Long Covid remains under-represented in the data that shapes healthcare decisions.

The Challenges of Coding Long Covid

Despite its importance, coding Long Covid in EMRs faces many challenges:

  1. Lack of Standardised Coding: The ICD-10 and SNOMED codes exist but their use is inconsistent. Many clinicians may not apply it, either due to unfamiliarity or because symptoms don’t neatly fit into a code’s description.
  2. Symptom Overlap and Complexity: Long Covid presents with a wide range of symptoms that overlap with other conditions like chronic fatigue syndrome or fibromyalgia. Clinicians may code individual symptoms (e.g., fatigue) rather than linking them to Long Covid, fragmenting the data.
  3. Confusion with other medical problems. Where patients have other long-term medical problems - such as chronic lung disease or cognitive impairment - new symptoms may be be assumed to be of these conditions rather than from Long Covid.
  4. Limited Clinician Awareness: In busy clinical settings, Long Covid may not be recognised or prioritised, especially if patients present with vague or multisystem symptoms. Lack of training on Long Covid’s diagnostic criteria exacerbates this issue.
  5. Under-reporting by Patients: Some patients may not seek care for persistent symptoms, or their concerns may be dismissed, leading to no record of Long Covid in EMRs.

These barriers lead to underestimation of Long Covid’s impact, which in turn limits research and resources needed to improve diagnosis and treatment.

The Consequences of Under-Coding

When Long Covid is not properly documented, the consequences ripple across patients, providers, and systems:

  • For Patients: Misdiagnosis or lack of a formal Long Covid diagnosis can delay treatment, leaving patients struggling without validation or access to specialised care.
  • For Research: Incomplete data hinders epidemiological studies, making it harder to understand Long Covid’s long-term effects or develop evidence-based treatments.
  • For Healthcare Systems: Without clear data, hospitals and clinics can’t plan for the growing demand for Long Covid care, leading to strained resources and inequities in access.
  • For Public Health: Policymakers rely on EMR data to justify funding and programs. Under-coding obscures the scale of the problem, potentially stalling progress.

Solutions to Improve Coding

Addressing the under-coding of Long Covid requires a multi-pronged approach:

  1. Standardised Coding Protocols: Healthcare systems should promote the consistent use of ICD-10 and SNOMED codes. Clear guidelines are also needed for when and how to apply these codes. Future iterations of coding systems could include more specific Long Covid codes to capture its diverse presentations.
  2. Clinician Training: Educating healthcare providers about Long Covid’s symptoms, diagnostic criteria, and coding practices is essential. Continuing medical education (CME) programs can bridge knowledge gaps and encourage proactive documentation.
  3. Technology and AI: Natural language processing (NLP) tools can analyse unstructured EMR data, such as clinician notes, to flag potential Long Covid cases that might otherwise go uncoded. Integrating these tools into EMR systems could improve case identification.
  4. Patient Awareness: Public health campaigns can encourage patients to report persistent symptoms and advocate for themselves, ensuring their conditions are documented.
  5. Research and Collaboration: Partnerships between health systems, researchers, and policymakers can drive the development of better diagnostic and coding frameworks, informed by real-world data.

Conclusions

The under-recording of Long Covid in electronic medical records is more than a technical issue. It is a barrier to understanding and addressing a condition that affects millions of people globally. Accurate coding is the foundation for robust research, effective patient care, and informed public health strategies. By prioritising standardised coding, clinician education, and innovative technologies, we can shine a light on Long Covid’s true impact and pave the way for better outcomes.

For healthcare providers and clinicians, the message is clear: document Long Covid deliberately and consistently. For patients, it is about advocating for your health and ensuring your symptoms are recorded. And for health systems, it’s about investing in the tools and training needed to make electronic medical records an effective tool in managing Long Covid at patient, healthcare provider and national levels. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Protecting Against the "Quad-demic": Influenza, Covid-19, Norovirus and RSV

As the NHS braces for a challenging winter season, it is grappling with a "quad-demic" of health emergencies caused by influenza, Covid-19, norovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). This confluence of viral threats poses a significant risk to public health in the UK as well as putting strain on healthcare resources, emphasising the importance of preventive measures to safeguard public health. Public health measures such a vaccination and good personal hygiene are pivotal in reducing the impact of these illnesses, particularly for vulnerable groups. The Four Viruses: What Are They? Influenza: A highly contagious respiratory infection that causes significant illness each winter. It can lead to severe complications, particularly in the elderly, young children, pregnant women, and those with chronic health conditions. Covid-19: Though its most acute phase has passed, Covid-19 remains a concern, especially as new variants of SA...

MPH Student Presentations on the NHS Care.Data Programme

As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments fo...

The Hidden Cost of Cheaper NHS Contracts: Losing Community Trust

NHS budgets are under considerable pressure. It is therefore unsurprising that many NHS Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) In England will aim to prioritise price in contract awards, But this approach is a significant threat to community-centred healthcare. While competitive tendering is a legally required, an excessive focus on costs in awarding NHS contracts risks overshadowing key factors such as established community trust, local expertise, and the long-term impact on continuity of care. This shift towards cheaper, often external, commercial providers threatens to cut the links between communities and their local health services. The argument that competitive tendering is solely about legal compliance, and not cost, is undermined by the very nature of such tendering, which by design encourages the lowest bid. This approach risks eroding the social fabric of local healthcare provision, where established relationships and understanding of specific community needs are essential. Establishe...