A New Vaccination Plan for England Must Start with Reinvesting in General Practice

The Parliamentary Health and Social Care Committee states that the Government’s vaccination strategy is ‘a failure’ and should be replaced with a new plan. Vaccination rates in the UK have been falling since around 2012 when pressures on GP services began to increase.

A key part of the solution to improving childhood vaccination rates in not to create new services like “family hubs” but to invest in core general practice services to increase primary care capacity. This needs to be combined with greater incentives for childhood vaccination.

A successful vaccination strategy must strengthen and not sideline general practice. Without substantial reinvestment in general practice and improved incentives, any new structures will struggle to reverse the long-term decline in childhood vaccination coverage in the UK.

GPs provide continuity, trusted relationships, accurate records, recalls, and opportunistic vaccination; all of which are essential for high uptake. When GP capacity is stretched, these functions weaken and coverage falls as we have seen over the past decade.

The decline in our national vaccination rates is not therefore an inevitability; it is a direct consequence of a strained primary care system. We must stop looking for 'quick fixes' and new administrative layers and instead return to what has worked in the past: a well-funded and adequately-staffed General Practice system.

Comments

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

MPH Student Presentations on the NHS Care.Data Programme

As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments fo...

What makes a good doctor – and who gets to decide?

What Makes a Good Doctor? This is the question that Waseem Jerjes and I explore in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine . It is a key question that underpins the architecture of medical education, clinical practice, regulation, and professional identity. It cannot be answered by regulators, educators, or employers in isolation. It must be answered together – by doctors and patients – revisited throughout a career, and adapted as society and the profession change. Without that shared reflection, the danger is not simply disillusionment, but the erosion of the moral foundations of clinical work. As we enter an era when diagnosis will increasingly involve artificial intelligence and when performance metrics reward volume over value, reclaiming this question as a professional one is imperative. The integrity of our institutions – and of the practitioners within them – depends on reimagining excellence in inclusive, relational terms. A good doctor is not a flawless technician or a f...

Medical Centre

Search This Blog