Skip to main content

MPH Student Presentations on the NHS Care.Data Programme

As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments:



You can also read the NHS Guide to Care.Data, Information on Care.Data on NHS Choices, and an Unofficial Guide to Care.Data published by wired.co.uk.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Don't forget the constant failure of Government inspired databases
9:08 pm
Anonymous said…
"Don't forget the constant failure of Government inspired databases" <-- this database has been working fine for 25 years with secondary care data. All they're doing is expanding it to include primary care
2:03 am
boneman said…
I would say the 'Against' argument wins convincingly - on the basis of the two PowerPoint presentations...
1:48 pm
Anonymous said…
So sad to see so many against this excellent initiative. I would share my data willingly. Not just for my sake but for all mankind. Enormous benefits can come when all this data is "mined" by PhD students which can lead to better insights into some diseases and better treatments which benefit millions of people. Some comments elsewhere seem to be paranoid about private companies benefiting in some way. Every time you go to the chemist with a prescription it doesn't seem to bother you then. So the "Big Pharma" guys seem to be not so bad after all, when you need them.
8:32 am
Anonymous said…
There are a number of issues involved in care.data - including management of the linked datasets (which will be so rich that they ought to be considered re-identifiable): who has access and how that access is managed ( a 'data lab' environment such as the one operated by QResearch is inherently less risky than a release of the whole dataset): the quality of the data gathered, and whether the two (or more) datasets being linked contain comperable data.
see
http://phcsg.org/clicsig-5614-can-care-data-be-made-compatible-with-patient-confidentiality/
There has been support for the concept of using the incredibly rich data held in GP medical records for research purposes for a long time - hence the existence of research databases such as QResearch, the CPRD, ResearchOne, and THIN.
http://phcsg.org/publications/fair-shares-for-all-final/
2:28 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...
Post a Comment
Read more

UK Covid-19 Inquiry - The Importance of a Strong Primary Healthcare System

In my witness statement for Module 10 of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, I discuss the pandemic's impact through from the perspectives of  primary care and public health, drawing on my extensive experience as a senior academic at Imperial College London and as a practising GP and NHS Public Health Specialist.  I emphasise that the pandemic disproportionately affected people who were clinically vulnerable, the disabled, ethnic minority communities and those living in deprived areas. The pandemic highlighted how structural inequalities, multigenerational housing, and employment in high-risk frontline roles exacerbated health disparities.  My statement also critiques the weakening of public health infrastructure - particularly for the control of infectious diseases - and the lack of integrated health data systems to identify at-risk groups such as the clinically vulnerable. I also advocated for a more robust preventive healthcare model that prioritises community-based primary care ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Relevance Over Recall: Rethinking How AI Uses Clinical Data

Our article in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine argues that safe and effective AI in healthcare must incorporate mechanisms that emulate human judgement - down-weighting old, inaccurate or superseded information and prioritising what is recent, clinically relevant and reaffirmed - so that AI supports, rather than disrupts, high-quality patient care.  Clinicians constantly revise, reinterpret and filter past information so that only what is relevant, accurate and timely shapes present-day management decisions; medical records function as dynamic “working tools” rather than fixed archives. By contrast, many AI systems lack this capacity for selective forgetting and often treat all historical data as equally meaningful.  This can lead to outdated or low-confidence diagnoses being repeatedly resurfaced, persistent labels influencing clinical expectations, and irrelevant, long-resolved events cluttering summaries and decision-support outputs. Such indiscriminate recall...
Post a Comment
Read more