A recent paper in the journal Thorax by Amaia Calderón-Larrañaga annd colleagues examined the association between hospital admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) and population and primary health care factors. Hospital admission rates for COPD are known to be strongly associated with population factors. Primary care services may also affect admission rates, but there is little direct supporting evidence. The study examined admission rates in 8,064 general practices in 152 English PCTs. Admission rates for COPD were strongly associated with population deprivation and smoking prevalence, whereas healthcare factors such as influenza immunisation, patient-reported access to consultations within two days, and primary care staffing, were protective.
As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments for th
Comments