Medical technology has developed rapidly in recent in recent decades and there is now real potential to apply these technological developments to improve the quality, safety and efficiency of healthcare worldwide. In a report published in the leading medical journal, The Lancet, Peter Howitt and colleagues from Imperial College London examine how medical technology should best be used to improve health in low- and middle-income countries. The report concludes that in many cases, medical technology — almost exclusively developed in rich countries— is not appropriate for use in poorer nations. Although medical technology is making a substantial contribution to global health, there is much more that it could do if developed and applied correctly for low and middle income countries.
As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments fo...
Comments