Skip to main content

National rules are needed about restriction of NHS prescriptions for drugs available over the counter

A recent news article in the BMJ reported that many clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) in England are trying to restrict NHS prescriptions for drugs that are also available over the counter (OTC). This would include, for example, drugs such as antihistamines. This raises a number of issues. Firstly, CCGs have no legal power to limit the prescribing of drugs by GPs (although many CCGs and GPs don’t seem to know this). The only drugs that GPs are not allowed to prescribe are those listed in Part XVIIIA of the NHS Drug Tariff (sometimes referred to as the ‘blacklist’). 

Secondly, rather than going through a formal process and asking the Department of Health to place additional drugs on the ‘blacklist’, CCGs seem content to let doctors decide who should have these drugs on NHS prescription and who should not. This will inevitably lead to considerable variation between GPs in their propensity to prescribe these drugs, thereby leading to ‘postcode prescribing’. 

Thirdly, it also raises legal issues in that if there is a complaint about the failure to issue a prescription for a drug the CCG does not want GPs to prescribe, it will be the GP and not the CCG who will be at risk and who will have to defend any complaint made by the patient or their representative (many GPs seem unaware of this and seem to think – mistakenly – that if they are following a CCG policy they will somehow be protected against complaints).

Each CCG carrying its own evidence review, public and professional consultation, and developing its implementation policy also results in considerable duplication of effort. At a time when the NHS has been asked to make considerable efficiency savings, we can't afford to waste financial, managerial and clinical resources on this scale.

Finally, such restrictions may disproportionately affect poorer patients who will be less able to pay for OTC drugs. 

If CCGs think the NHS can no longer afford to prescribe certain drugs, then they should group together and raise this issue with the Department of Health and NHS England; and ask them to add these drugs to the list of drugs that cannot be prescribed on the NHS.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

Talking to Patients About Weight-Loss Drugs

The use of weight-loss drugs such as GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, tirzepatide) has increased rapidly in recent years. These drugs can help some people achieve significant weight reduction, but they are not suitable for everyone and require careful counselling before starting treatment. By discussing benefits, risks, practicalities, and  uncertainties, clinicians can help patients make informed, realistic decisions about their treatment. Key points to discuss with patients 1. Indications and eligibility These drugs are usually licensed for adults with a specific BMI. They should be used alongside lifestyle interventions such as dietary change, increased physical activity, and behaviour modification. 2. Potential side effects – some can be serious Common adverse effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, and abdominal discomfort. Less common but more serious risks include gallstones, pancreatitis and visual problems. Patients should know what to watch for a...

What makes a good doctor – and who gets to decide?

What Makes a Good Doctor? This is the question that Waseem Jerjes and I explore in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine . It is a key question that underpins the architecture of medical education, clinical practice, regulation, and professional identity. It cannot be answered by regulators, educators, or employers in isolation. It must be answered together – by doctors and patients – revisited throughout a career, and adapted as society and the profession change. Without that shared reflection, the danger is not simply disillusionment, but the erosion of the moral foundations of clinical work. As we enter an era when diagnosis will increasingly involve artificial intelligence and when performance metrics reward volume over value, reclaiming this question as a professional one is imperative. The integrity of our institutions – and of the practitioners within them – depends on reimagining excellence in inclusive, relational terms. A good doctor is not a flawless technician or a f...