Skip to main content

Doctors and dogs: why they shouldn't mix professionally

Why doctors and dogs should not mix on house visits to patients. This might seem a strange topic to discuss but it is important to health professionals and is something they don’t teach you about in medical school. Bottom line: always ensure the dog is in a separate room when you do a house call.

It’s very common when you arrive at a house to be do a home visit to be greeted by the sound of barking dogs. The owners will always try to reassure you that the dogs are "just being friendly" and are "harmless". Ignore them and insist the dogs are put in another room before you enter.

This sometimes causes resentment with the patient who often views the dog as a much-loved, close family member that is perfectly entitled to be present in the room while the patient has their consultation with the doctor. Do not give in to this pressure.

It is very difficult to carry out a clinical consultation while you have a dog (sometimes several dogs) jumping all over you, distracting you from your work, and getting in your way. And we are often talking here about very large dogs, not just small poodles and terriers. 

I’ve been fortunate and never had a "bad dog experience" during a home visit. But many colleagues have reported they have been bitten, had their clothes or equipment chewed; and sometimes even been urinated on. Having the dog in a separate room eliminates these risks. Prevention is better than cure.

If you have reached this far in blog, you have probably realised that I am not a “dog person”. Anyone who loves dogs and knows more about them than me is welcome to offer alternative suggestions about how to minimise the risks from dogs during house calls.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

New NHS community mental health centres in England

The Government has announced it will create over 100 new community mental health centres across England, which will work alongside GPs and other NHS organisations/ The centres will offer offer walk-in support as well as seeing patients referred from elsewhere in the NHS. GPs have long called for faster access to specialist mental health support for patients, so the expansion of community mental health services is a welcome development. If these new centres improve access to multidisciplinary teams, reduce waiting times and provide more integrated care, they can improve patient outcomes while reducing pressure on both general practice and specialist mental health services. Close collaboration between GPs, mental health professionals, social care and the voluntary sector will be essential because many people with mental health problems also have wider social and physical health needs. The success of these centres will depend on how they are implemented. They need to be adequately staffe...

Protecting Young People from Meningococcal B Disease: The NHS Targeted Vaccination Programme

Meningococcal group B (MenB) infections are rare but can have devastating consequences. The decision to offer a targeted two-dose vaccination programme to Year 13 students and young people entering university or residential further education reflects concerns about recent outbreaks of meningococcal disease and the higher risk of transmission when large numbers of young adults mix closely for the first time in shared accommodation. The MenB vaccine has a well-established safety record, and evidence from the UK infant immunisation programme has shown substantial reductions in disease among vaccinated children. A targeted programme for those entering higher-risk settings is therefore a reasonable precautionary measure while further evidence is gathered on whether the recent increase in clusters represents a temporary fluctuation in disease patterns or a more sustained change in the epidemiology of MenB infection. The success of the programme will depend on achieving high uptake and ensuri...