Skip to main content

What percentage of people remain positive after a diagnosis of Covid-19?

The recent change in isolation policy for people in England was based on a modelling study by Bays et al which showed that “after the 5th day after a positive test, an estimated 31% of persons remain infectious”.

Reference:  Bays D, Whiteley T, Pindar M, et al. Mitigating isolation: The use of rapid antigen testing to reduce the impact of self-isolation periods. medRxiv 2021:2021.12.23.21268326. doi: 10.1101/2021.12.23.21268326 

Bays et al Table 3: Percentages (rounded to integer) of people who are still infectious after each day according to their disease profile

 

Day

 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

Still infectious (%)

100

92

75

58

43

31

22

16

11

7

5

3

2

2

1

No-longer infectious (%)

0.0

8

25

42

57

69

78

84

89

93

95

97

98

98

99

 

Bays et al Table 4: Output from the model of the effect of the considered scenarios on disease release into the community (measured in three different ways) and the self-isolation in addition to that which is necessary to contain disease spread. Intervals are the 2.5 and 97.5 quantiles from the simulations.2

 

Policy

Released infectious (%)

Mean time a released person is infectious for (hours)

Mean excess isolation per person (hours)

7-day isolation

15.8% [11.9 - 21.0]

62.3 [56.5 - 69.2]

76.8 [67.2 - 84.0]

10-day isolation

5.1% [3.4 - 7.6]

59.3 [53.5 - 65.6]

141.6 [129.6 - 151.2]

14-day isolation

1.0% [0.6 - 1.8]

57.1 [51.4 - 63.1]

235.2 [220.8 - 247.2]

10-day isolation, or 1 negative tests from day 7

9.2% [6.5 - 12.8]

61.1 [55.3 - 67.5]

79.2 [69.6 - 86.4]

10-day isolation, or 2 negative tests from day 6

6.2% [4.2 - 9.0]

60.0 [53.9 - 66.3]

81.6 [72.0 - 88.8]

14-day isolation, or 2 negative tests from day 6

4.1% [2.6 - 6.0]

61.3 [55.8 - 67.7]

69.6 [64.8 - 74.4]

 

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...
Post a Comment
Read more

UK Covid-19 Inquiry - The Importance of a Strong Primary Healthcare System

In my witness statement for Module 10 of the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, I discuss the pandemic's impact through from the perspectives of  primary care and public health, drawing on my extensive experience as a senior academic at Imperial College London and as a practising GP and NHS Public Health Specialist.  I emphasise that the pandemic disproportionately affected people who were clinically vulnerable, the disabled, ethnic minority communities and those living in deprived areas. The pandemic highlighted how structural inequalities, multigenerational housing, and employment in high-risk frontline roles exacerbated health disparities.  My statement also critiques the weakening of public health infrastructure - particularly for the control of infectious diseases - and the lack of integrated health data systems to identify at-risk groups such as the clinically vulnerable. I also advocated for a more robust preventive healthcare model that prioritises community-based primary care ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Relevance Over Recall: Rethinking How AI Uses Clinical Data

Our article in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine argues that safe and effective AI in healthcare must incorporate mechanisms that emulate human judgement - down-weighting old, inaccurate or superseded information and prioritising what is recent, clinically relevant and reaffirmed - so that AI supports, rather than disrupts, high-quality patient care.  Clinicians constantly revise, reinterpret and filter past information so that only what is relevant, accurate and timely shapes present-day management decisions; medical records function as dynamic “working tools” rather than fixed archives. By contrast, many AI systems lack this capacity for selective forgetting and often treat all historical data as equally meaningful.  This can lead to outdated or low-confidence diagnoses being repeatedly resurfaced, persistent labels influencing clinical expectations, and irrelevant, long-resolved events cluttering summaries and decision-support outputs. Such indiscriminate recall...
Post a Comment
Read more