Skip to main content

Now is the time for radical action on racial health inequalities

A new report by the NHS Race and Health Observatory makes robust recommendations—we must act on them

The magnitude of racial health inequalities reported in the NHS Race and Health Observatory’s recent review comes as no surprise.1 It highlighted the overwhelming, stark, widespread, and longstanding inequalities that people from ethnic minorities in the UK experience in access to healthcare and outcomes. The report found that this occurs “at every stage, throughout the life course, from birth to death” and is “rooted in experiences of structural, institutional, and interpersonal racism.”1 This evidence has been known for a long time, with the disproportionate impacts of covid-19 on people from ethnic minorities drawing even greater attention to and wider recognition of these facts.23 Will evidence, however, be enough to compel those charged with the nation’s health to acknowledge and take urgent action to redress these egregious inequalities?

Firstly, there are significant gaps in the literature, as well as poor quality, inconsistent, and incomplete data in some places. Secondly, the review only focused on five “priority” areas: mental health, maternal and neonatal care, digital healthcare, genomic medicine, and the NHS workforce. However, the evidence that exists, which spans over a decade and has been examined by this independent body, should be a wake-up call for the government and the NHS.

Fear and distrust run through most of this review, particularly in mental healthcare, maternal care, and digital access. Furthermore, negative experiences, poor communication, and substandard care marked by insensitive, discriminatory interactions are also common among ethnic minorities, who are then deterred from seeking care from the NHS. There are significant barriers to accessing psychological therapies, including cognitive behavioural therapies and children’s mental health services, due to fewer referrals from general practice, but also lower levels of health literacy, poorer access to online health services, and resultant challenges to self-referral. This illustrates the need for a broader approach to tackle health inequalities, including working on areas such as education and poverty.

People from ethnic minority groups, particularly Black individuals, are more likely to face compulsory admission to psychiatric wards, receive harsher treatments, and are more likely to be restrained and put into seclusion.14 NHS staff from ethnic minorities do not fare any better than the patients. Their experiences are marked by racist abuse—both from patients and other staff—lack of career progression, and an ethnic pay gap.15

The review suggests robust recommendations on how to bring about a radical and imaginative change in policy, practice, attitude, and approach. It starts with better, more accurate, and granular ethnic data monitoring in the NHS and linking these clinical data across the health service to improve clinical outcomes for ethnic minority groups. It is also necessary to improve access to and experiences of care by more targeted investment, as well as providing resources for some areas, such as high quality interpreter services.1

There is also much that needs to be done to build trust. The impact of the covid-19 pandemic, especially the lower uptake of covid-19 vaccines among certain groups, has brought the issue of trust into sharp relief.6 Trust cannot be built if the government continues to abnegate responsibility and turn its face away from the lived experiences of racism, in particular systemic racism, among ethnic minorities. A sincere attempt to understand and engage with communities will do much to establish trust, which will, in turn, lead to better health outcomes.

Neither evidence nor a clarion call for action alone—no matter how clarifying and stark—would lead to meaningful change. We have been here before. Numerous past inquiries, by governments and independent bodies alike, have made urgent calls for a new approach, only to be frustrated by inaction, endless deferrals, and delays.3

A strong political will is, therefore, required to turn the wheels of change. Inaction costs lives and would lead to a worsening of systematic socioeconomic and health inequalities. For those of us who have raised the ineluctable facts of racism—in particular systemic racism—as a major driver of racial health inequalities,7 our position is perhaps encapsulated by the author and public intellectual CW Lewis in his 1942 novel, The Screwtape Letters.

“The greatest evil is done not in sordid dens of evil that Dickens loved to paint, but it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clear, carpeted, warmed, and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices.” 8

The time to tackle unconscionable racial health inequalities in this country is now and the NHS Race and Health Observatory’s review can help start that change.

This article was first published in the British Medical Journal.

References
  1. ↵
  2. ↵
  3. ↵
  4. ↵
  5. ↵
  6. ↵
  7. ↵
  8. ↵

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

New NHS community mental health centres in England

The Government has announced it will create over 100 new community mental health centres across England, which will work alongside GPs and other NHS organisations/ The centres will offer offer walk-in support as well as seeing patients referred from elsewhere in the NHS. GPs have long called for faster access to specialist mental health support for patients, so the expansion of community mental health services is a welcome development. If these new centres improve access to multidisciplinary teams, reduce waiting times and provide more integrated care, they can improve patient outcomes while reducing pressure on both general practice and specialist mental health services. Close collaboration between GPs, mental health professionals, social care and the voluntary sector will be essential because many people with mental health problems also have wider social and physical health needs. The success of these centres will depend on how they are implemented. They need to be adequately staffe...

Protecting Young People from Meningococcal B Disease: The NHS Targeted Vaccination Programme

Meningococcal group B (MenB) infections are rare but can have devastating consequences. The decision to offer a targeted two-dose vaccination programme to Year 13 students and young people entering university or residential further education reflects concerns about recent outbreaks of meningococcal disease and the higher risk of transmission when large numbers of young adults mix closely for the first time in shared accommodation. The MenB vaccine has a well-established safety record, and evidence from the UK infant immunisation programme has shown substantial reductions in disease among vaccinated children. A targeted programme for those entering higher-risk settings is therefore a reasonable precautionary measure while further evidence is gathered on whether the recent increase in clusters represents a temporary fluctuation in disease patterns or a more sustained change in the epidemiology of MenB infection. The success of the programme will depend on achieving high uptake and ensuri...