Throughout the pandemic, the UK’s covid-19 data systems have been guiding global as well as local policies. The well-established health information systems combined with the more recently established National Immunisation Management System in England provided timely information on infections, emergence of new variants, and the value of different interventions. But one of the most important contributions from the UK came from the ability to rapidly track vaccine effectiveness.
Vaccination is the best method for societies to reduce the
severity of illness and number of deaths from covid-19; and to start to return
to a more normal way of living, working
Clinical trials are also generally unable to provide data on
smaller subgroups of the population such as people who are immunocompromised;
or how different vaccines compare in their long-term safety and effectiveness.
This data has to largely come from national immunisation systems and from
medical records, as does data on vaccine uptake in different groups of the
population. These are areas where the UK has excelled during the covid-19
pandemic in work led by government organisations such as the UK Health Security
Agency and the UK Office for National Statistics.
In England, the UK Health Security Agency has assessed
vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic covid-19 infection using community
testing data linked to vaccination data from the National Immunisation
Management System (NIMS); with further linkage to data from electronic NHS
secondary care datasets; sequencing and
genomics data; travel information; and mortality records. These data have
allowed analysis of how well covid-19 vaccines protect against outcomes such as
hospitalisation and death as well as against symptomatic infection during the
course of the pandemic.[3] With the linkage of secondary care datasets and NIMS
data, it has also allowed for timely epidemiological safety signal assessments
to be rapidly carried out in response to passive reports of adverse events
after vaccination from the MHRA yellow card system. The large size of the
English population allows for more precise estimation of these effects;
something that is not always possible in data from countries with smaller health
systems. Data from the UK also allowed identification of people at highest risk
from the complications of covid-19, which helped in deciding which groups would
be prioritised for vaccination. UK data also allowed the tracking of
breakthrough infections following vaccination better than any other country;
and confirmed that delaying the second dose of vaccine was likely to lead to
better protection from serious illness.
Most recently, the data has allowed analysis of how well
vaccines protect against new variants of SARS-CoV-2 such delta and omicron. The
latest data confirm that three doses of vaccines provide good protection from
hospitalisation and death from an omicron infection; but that the level of
protection is not as high as against the delta variant that was previously
predominant in many parts of the world.
Other data can be linked to the NIMS to allow estimation of
vaccine uptake by age group, area of England and by ethnic group. This has
proved essential in identifying population groups and geographical areas with
lower than average vaccine uptake. For example, the data has shown that vaccine
uptake is generally lower in younger age groups than among older people; and lower
in large, urban areas such as London than in other parts of England.
Looking forward, it is important that we maintain our data
collection, linkage, analysis and publication abilities for the longer-term.[8]
Although we must now all learn to live with covid-19, SARS-CoV-2 will still
pose a threat to global health for some time, especially if new escape variants
emerge.[9] Furthermore, with population-level immunity after vaccination waning
and covid-19 control measures ending, there is a risk that later in the year we
may see a surge in infections in the UK and elsewhere; in recent weeks, we have
already seen an increase in covid-19 infections and hospital admissions in the
UK. In addition, changes in testing behaviour and guidance may affect how
vaccine effectiveness is monitored in the future. The data systems, scope for
data linkage
Azeem Majeed, Elise Tessier, Julia Stowe, Ali Mokdad
A version of this article was first published in the British Medical Journal.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o839
References
1. Majeed A, Molokhia M. Vaccinating the UK against
covid-19. BMJ. 2020 Nov 30;371:m4654. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4654.
2. Majeed A, Papaluca M, Molokhia M. Assessing the long-term
safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Journal of the Royal Society of
Medicine. 2021;114(7):337-340.
3. Monitoring reports of the effectiveness of COVID-19
vaccination. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/monitoring-reports-of-the-effectiveness-of-covid-19-vaccination
4. Andrews N, Stowe J, Kirsebom F, et al. Covid-19 Vaccine
Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar
2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2119451.
5. Walker P, David N. UK: over-75s and vulnerable people to
be offered additional Covid booster jab. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/feb/21/uk-older-vulnerable-people-to-be-offered-covid-booster-vaccine
6. Office for National Statistics. Coronavirus (COVID-19)
latest insights: Vaccines. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/vaccines
7. Official UK government website for data and insights on coronavirus
(COVID-19). https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/
8. Tapper J. Dismay as funding for UK’s ‘world-beating’
Covid trackers is axed. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/12/dismay-as-funding-for-uks-world-beating-covid-trackers-is-axed
9. Murray CH, Mokdad AH. After the Mandates End. Preparing
for the next COVID-19 variant. https://www.thinkglobalhealth.org/article/after-mandates-end
10. Dowd JB. The UK’s covid-19 data collection has been “world beating”—let’s not throw it away. BMJ 2022; 376 :o496.
Comments