Skip to main content

Clinical Update for Dr Curran and Partners 1 December 2022

Topics I presented in my practice’s clinical meeting today:


1. ADHD referral update

a. ADHD referrals are rejected by a clinician in the specialist team if thought to be unsuitable for the service but sometimes this is a team decision, so they prefer not to give a specific name on the rejection letter.

b. They don’t have the ability to “pause” referrals. Hence, if key information is missing, a referral is rejected as they can’t put it on hold.

c.  When making a referral, ensure that the key diagnostic criteria are all included. These should be in the referral form but are also available online.

https://selondonccg.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/SEL-ICS-Adult-ADHD-referral-criteria-v1-2022.pdf

d. Private patients and overseas patients. Consultant Connect can be used to get advice quickly and this can allow medication to be continued if indicated for patients with a confirmed diagnosis. Consultant Connect for the ADHD service is currently under-used by local GPs.

e. Referral numbers have increased substantially in recent years, making waiting times for assessment very long (currently around 2 years). Consultant Connect can be used for advice (search for ‘mental health - adult ADHD and autism’).

 

2. Supporting healthcare workers with work related stress

Many healthcare workers report problems such as stress, anxiety and burnout. I recently published a clinical guide on this area in the BMJ. https://www.bmj.com/content/379/bmj-2022-070779

 

3. Access to ‘fast-track’ cancer tests

General practices will be able to directly order fast-track cancer diagnostic tests for their patients. This is a potentially useful development but there are some caveats. Firstly, there needs to be sufficient capacity to cope with an increase in referrals for investigations by GPs. This means having enough equipment – such as scanners – and the staff to operate the equipment and report on the scans. GPs would also need a dialogue with radiologists before ordering scans to ensure the correct scan was ordered and that the request was appropriate.

Finally, the cancer system is not coping well with the current number of referrals with for example the number of patients starting treatment within 62 days of referral is below target. Hence, there is a need to look at the entire cancer care pathway (not just diagnostics).  It’s essential to ensure there is capacity in the system to see patients and start treatment within the target times. Increasing the number of tests (and patients with suspicious lesions who need further assessment) may lead to a further deterioration in NHS cancer performance if this is not done.

 See https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/clinical-areas/cancer/gps-to-have-direct-access-to-fast-track-cancer-tests-from-this-month/

 

4. Diphtheria and other infectious diseases in refugee centres

Cases of Diphtheria have been reported among people living in refugee centres. Such locations are high-risk settings for the transmission of infections. It’s important to check the vaccine status of any new migrants joining the practice and offer both adults and children any necessary vaccines.

 

5. Appointment data

This has been published and is available online for the public to view. It’s important to log all patient contacts and discussions about patients with external healthcare professionals on the appointment screen to ensure that practice activity is picked up in the data. It’s also essential ensure the correct consultation mode is selected (e.g. face to face in surgery, home visit, telephone).

 

6. Covid-19 Update

Not much change recently. Hospital admissions and deaths remain relatively low but may begin to increase from December onwards due to greater indoor mixing. Vaccination rates in London for the Autumn booster programme are well behind the average for England.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

MPH Student Presentations on the NHS Care.Data Programme

As part of a session on primary care data in the Health Informatics module on the Imperial Master of Public Health Programme, I asked students to work in two groups to present arguments for and against the NHS Care.Data programme. Care.Data is an NHS programme that will extract data from the medical records held by general practitioners (GPs) in England. The Care.Data programme takes advantage of the very high level of use of electronic medical records by GPs in England. After extraction, data will be uploaded to the NHS Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). The data will then be used for functions such as health care planning, monitoring disease patterns and research. The programme has been controversial with proponents arguing that the programme will bring many benefits for the NHS and the population of England; and opponents arguing it is a major breach of privacy. You can view the two presentations to help inform you further about these arguments: Arguments fo...

What makes a good doctor – and who gets to decide?

What Makes a Good Doctor? This is the question that Waseem Jerjes and I explore in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine . It is a key question that underpins the architecture of medical education, clinical practice, regulation, and professional identity. It cannot be answered by regulators, educators, or employers in isolation. It must be answered together – by doctors and patients – revisited throughout a career, and adapted as society and the profession change. Without that shared reflection, the danger is not simply disillusionment, but the erosion of the moral foundations of clinical work. As we enter an era when diagnosis will increasingly involve artificial intelligence and when performance metrics reward volume over value, reclaiming this question as a professional one is imperative. The integrity of our institutions – and of the practitioners within them – depends on reimagining excellence in inclusive, relational terms. A good doctor is not a flawless technician or a f...