Skip to main content

Clinical Update for Primary Care Team 9 February 2023

 1. Routine Covid-19 vaccination for people under 50 is ending

Adults under 50 in England have until 12 February 2023 to take up the NHS offer of a Covid-19 vaccination. After this date, only people in higher-risk groups under 50 are likely to be eligible for a Covid-19 vaccination. See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-64496025

2. Medical examiner system

Implementation of the statutory medical examiner system will start from April 2023. Medical examiners are doctors who provide independent scrutiny of the causes of death. 

The purpose of the medical examiner system is to:

·         provide greater safeguards for the public by ensuring independent scrutiny of all non-coronial deaths

·         ensure the appropriate direction of deaths to the coroner

·         provide a better service for the bereaved and an opportunity for them to raise any concerns to a doctor not involved in the care of the deceased

·         improve the quality of death certification

·         improve the quality of mortality data

Medical examiners seek to answer three questions:

·         What caused the death of the deceased?

·         Does the coroner need to be notified of the death?

·         Was the care before death appropriate?

Medical examiners answer these by providing independent scrutiny, with three elements:

·         A proportionate review of relevant medical records

·         Interaction with the doctor completing the Medical Certificate of Cause of Death

·         Interaction with the bereaved, providing an opportunity to ask questions and to raise concerns

Implications for doctors completing death certificates:

·         Complete the death certificate accurately using the correct terms and sequence of causes.

·         Ensure the information in the deceased’s medical record supports the cause of death given on the death certificate.

See https://www.england.nhs.uk/establishing-medical-examiner-system-nhs/non-coronial-deaths-in-the-community/

3. Diagnosis and management of Monkeypox

An article published in the BMJ by myself and colleagues discusses the diagnosis and management of Monkeypox. See https://www.bmj.com/content/380/bmj-2022-073352

4. New NHS General Practice contract

Negotiations between the BMA’s GP Committee and NHS England about a new NHS General Practice contract in England have broken down, making it likely that NHS England will impose a contract unilaterally that the BMA views as unfavourable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...

What makes a good doctor – and who gets to decide?

What Makes a Good Doctor? This is the question that Waseem Jerjes and I explore in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine . It is a key question that underpins the architecture of medical education, clinical practice, regulation, and professional identity. It cannot be answered by regulators, educators, or employers in isolation. It must be answered together – by doctors and patients – revisited throughout a career, and adapted as society and the profession change. Without that shared reflection, the danger is not simply disillusionment, but the erosion of the moral foundations of clinical work. As we enter an era when diagnosis will increasingly involve artificial intelligence and when performance metrics reward volume over value, reclaiming this question as a professional one is imperative. The integrity of our institutions – and of the practitioners within them – depends on reimagining excellence in inclusive, relational terms. A good doctor is not a flawless technician or a f...

Relevance Over Recall: Rethinking How AI Uses Clinical Data

Our article in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine argues that safe and effective AI in healthcare must incorporate mechanisms that emulate human judgement - down-weighting old, inaccurate or superseded information and prioritising what is recent, clinically relevant and reaffirmed - so that AI supports, rather than disrupts, high-quality patient care.  Clinicians constantly revise, reinterpret and filter past information so that only what is relevant, accurate and timely shapes present-day management decisions; medical records function as dynamic “working tools” rather than fixed archives. By contrast, many AI systems lack this capacity for selective forgetting and often treat all historical data as equally meaningful.  This can lead to outdated or low-confidence diagnoses being repeatedly resurfaced, persistent labels influencing clinical expectations, and irrelevant, long-resolved events cluttering summaries and decision-support outputs. Such indiscriminate recall...