Skip to main content

Key steps in implementing the annual flu vaccination programme

Today’s clinical update looks at flu vaccine uptake. The NHS offers free vaccination to eligible patients in the UK but there is planning needed to ensure the flu vaccine programme is implemented effectively and achieves a high uptake. There is still scope to improve uptake this year and for the next flu vaccine campaign in the Autumn of 2023.

Key steps in implementing the annual flu vaccination programme

  1. Give one member of the practice team responsibility for leading the vaccination programme, supported by the wider practice team.
  2. Ensure staff are informed about the programme; including start dates, who is eligible and the benefits of vaccination for the individual patient, their family and society.
  3. Prepare FAQs to common questions from patients. These are usually available on government websites such as those published by NHS England and the UKHSA. Ensure staff know where to look for these FAQs, which are essential in countering misinformation about vaccination.
  4. Ensure medical records are as accurate as possible so that target groups for vaccination can be identified (e.g. to identify at risk people aged under 65 years eligible for vaccination).
  5. Prime patients with information about vaccination before the programme starts, including start dates, who is eligible; and the benefits of vaccination for the individual, their family and society.
  6. Provide accessible clinics for flu vaccination and also offer opportunistic vaccination to patients when they attend appointments at the practice for other reasons.
  7. Monitor uptake in each target group. Contact those who have not come forwards for vaccination by text, email or telephone. Also raise vaccination with patients in clinics.
  8. Many patients will receive flu vaccines in other settings such as pharmacies and workplaces. Details of vaccinations at NHS sites should be sent to the practice automatically but this may not be the case for vaccinations given at workplaces. Contact patients to check their vaccination status by text or email and enter vaccinations on their medical record if given elsewhere.
  9. Incentivise staff to achieve targets; and work with the patient participation group and other local community groups to increase vaccine uptake.
  10. The same principles can be applied to other vaccination programmes delivered by the practice (e.g. childhood vaccinations, shingles).
 For details of eligibility, see: The flu vaccination: who should have it and why.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the difference between primordial prevention and primary prevention?

Primordial prevention and primary prevention are both crucial strategies for promoting health, but they operate at different levels. Primordial prevention aims to address the root causes of health problems and improve the wider determinants of health. It focuses on preventing the emergence of risk factors in the first place by tackling the underlying social, economic, and environmental determinants of health. This involves broad, population-wide interventions such as: Policies that promote healthy food choices: Think about initiatives like taxing sugary drinks to discourage unhealthy consumption, or providing subsidies for fruits and vegetables to make them more accessible. Urban planning that prioritises well-being: This could include creating walkable neighborhoods with safe cycling routes, ensuring access to green spaces for recreation and relaxation, and designing communities that foster social connections. Social programs that address inequality: Initiatives aimed at reducing pov...
Post a Comment
Read more

What makes a good doctor – and who gets to decide?

What Makes a Good Doctor? This is the question that Waseem Jerjes and I explore in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine . It is a key question that underpins the architecture of medical education, clinical practice, regulation, and professional identity. It cannot be answered by regulators, educators, or employers in isolation. It must be answered together – by doctors and patients – revisited throughout a career, and adapted as society and the profession change. Without that shared reflection, the danger is not simply disillusionment, but the erosion of the moral foundations of clinical work. As we enter an era when diagnosis will increasingly involve artificial intelligence and when performance metrics reward volume over value, reclaiming this question as a professional one is imperative. The integrity of our institutions – and of the practitioners within them – depends on reimagining excellence in inclusive, relational terms. A good doctor is not a flawless technician or a f...
Post a Comment
Read more

Relevance Over Recall: Rethinking How AI Uses Clinical Data

Our article in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine argues that safe and effective AI in healthcare must incorporate mechanisms that emulate human judgement - down-weighting old, inaccurate or superseded information and prioritising what is recent, clinically relevant and reaffirmed - so that AI supports, rather than disrupts, high-quality patient care.  Clinicians constantly revise, reinterpret and filter past information so that only what is relevant, accurate and timely shapes present-day management decisions; medical records function as dynamic “working tools” rather than fixed archives. By contrast, many AI systems lack this capacity for selective forgetting and often treat all historical data as equally meaningful.  This can lead to outdated or low-confidence diagnoses being repeatedly resurfaced, persistent labels influencing clinical expectations, and irrelevant, long-resolved events cluttering summaries and decision-support outputs. Such indiscriminate recall...
Post a Comment
Read more